Archive for the ‘civil rights’ Category

Of Marriage and Legally Enshrined Discrimination

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

NYT: Court Rejects Same-Sex Marriage Ban in California

But Andrew Pugno, a lawyer for the defense, said Proposition 8 had nothing to do with discrimination, but rather with the will of California voters who “simply wished to preserve the historic definition of marriage.”

I wonder if those same statements were trotted out when the ban on interracial marriage was overturned in California half a century ago. So let us do a little fact checking on this “historic definition of marriage.”

From Merriam Webster:

Main Entry: mar·riage
Pronunciation: \ˈmer-ij, ˈma-rij\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English mariage, from Anglo-French, from marier to marry
Date: 14th century
1 a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2) : the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage b : the mutual relation of married persons : wedlock c : the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage
2 : an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is effected; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or formalities
3 : an intimate or close union

I see M-W changed their definition recently, because the term same-sex marriage didn’t exist until recently. How can I tell?

From EtymOnline, an online etymology database:

marry (v.)
c.1300, from O.Fr. marier, from L. maritare “to wed, marry, give in marriage,” from maritus “married man, husband,” of uncertain origin, perhaps ult. from “provided with a *mari,” a young woman, from PIE base *meri- “young wife,” akin to *meryo- “young man” (cf. Skt. marya- “young man, suitor”). Said from 1530 of the priest, etc., who performs the rite. Related: Married; marrying.

Notice how there’s nothing in there that specifies man AND woman, just young wife or young man or married man, husband.

I’ll leave you with this:

The United States has had a history of marriage restriction laws. Many states enacted miscegenation laws which were first introduced in the late seventeenth century in the slave-holding colonies of Virginia (1691) and Maryland (1692) and lasted until 1967 (until it was overturned via Loving v. Virginia). Many of these states restricted several minorities from marrying whites. For example, Alabama, Arkansas, and Oklahoma banned Blacks in particular. States such as Mississippi and Missouri banned Blacks and Asians. States such as North Carolina and South Carolina banned Blacks and Native Americans, and some states such as Georgia, South Carolina, and Virginia banned all non-whites.

There’s a reason he’s one of the greats of history

Monday, June 7th, 2010

Whenever I hear anyone arguing for slavery, I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally.
– Abraham Lincoln

It applies, I think, to quite a lot in life.

Poor Google

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

They admit to accidental wrongdoing and offer to make right. What does that get them? Threats from Germany.

In a related development, a law student from western Germany said Tuesday that he had filed a formal complaint with the Hamburg state prosecutor’s office alleging that Google’s WLAN data collection violated German law. Jens Ferner of Alsdorf said he faxed his complaint to the prosecutor’s office on Monday seeking to clarify the legal situation regarding use of open WLANs.

Why poor Google? German recently ruled that if you have an unsecured WLAN and someone connects to it and shares copyrighted data through it, YOU are liable for having an unsecured WLAN. But collect one bit of that unsecured data and all of a sudden the other party is liable.

Send your data flying willy nilly through the air and you deserve to have it collected. I mean, even if you give away your encryption key it’s still encrypted, that’s the whole point of public key encryption. The German government should be less worried about Google (oooh they could fine them 300,000 Euros! They might almost be able to afford a Google stock option for that amount…) and more worried about the fact that anyone else in the country could be listening in. And if I know a thing or two about Germans, they most certainly are. They had a secret police up until a mere generation ago. Methinks thou doth protest too much.

I imagine many other companies would never admit such a thing, and either quietly bury it or keep and use the data. We should say “Wow, thanks for admitting this and trying to make it right. Lets help you make it right.” Instead they’re threatened legally. You want to know how Google’s gonna save themselves a potential $300,000 fine in the future? Yeah, they know now to keep that shit quiet and just bury it.

The story behind? – burqa flashing

Monday, April 12th, 2010

burqa flash

burqa flash

I’m not sure whether it’s an act of protestation or exploitation, but if anyone knows I’d like to hear.

On the street finding its uses

Monday, February 15th, 2010

Indeed, the very ease with which pico projectors can be used to create social awkwardness could be a significant feature. Alexander Besher, one of the organizers of the pico projector film festival, thinks there could be significant use of pico projectors in political protests. Picture a nighttime war protest where hundreds of people have pico projectors showing graphic images of devastation on every available surface.

This was kinda ancillary to the article but man, what a great idea. Not one I’ve ever really heard before, either, but I can think of so many uses for these things now. Muwahahaha.