NYT: Court Rejects Same-Sex Marriage Ban in California
But Andrew Pugno, a lawyer for the defense, said Proposition 8 had nothing to do with discrimination, but rather with the will of California voters who “simply wished to preserve the historic definition of marriage.”
I wonder if those same statements were trotted out when the ban on interracial marriage was overturned in California half a century ago. So let us do a little fact checking on this “historic definition of marriage.”
From Merriam Webster:
Main Entry: mar·riage
Pronunciation: \ˈmer-ij, ˈma-rij\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English mariage, from Anglo-French, from marier to marry
Date: 14th century
1 a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2) : the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriageb : the mutual relation of married persons : wedlock c : the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage
2 : an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is effected; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or formalities
3 : an intimate or close union
I see M-W changed their definition recently, because the term same-sex marriage didn’t exist until recently. How can I tell?
From EtymOnline, an online etymology database:
marry (v.)
c.1300, from O.Fr. marier, from L. maritare “to wed, marry, give in marriage,” from maritus “married man, husband,” of uncertain origin, perhaps ult. from “provided with a *mari,” a young woman, from PIE base *meri- “young wife,” akin to *meryo- “young man” (cf. Skt. marya- “young man, suitor”). Said from 1530 of the priest, etc., who performs the rite. Related: Married; marrying.
Notice how there’s nothing in there that specifies man AND woman, just young wife or young man or married man, husband.
I’ll leave you with this:


