Archive for the ‘garbage’ Category

BP, bringer of energy, destroyer of environment

Monday, June 14th, 2010

The first summer I spent with my wife, years before I knew she would be my wife, we went to her family’s beach house in Perdido Bay.

#12 - Boston Globe Big Picture

Oil sheen is seen streaking under the Perdido Pass Bridge from the spill in the Gulf of Mexico off the Alabama coast as viewed from a Coast Guard HC-144A plane Thursday, June 10, 2010 in Perdido, Alabama. (AP Photo/Mobile Press-Register, John David Mercer)

We cruised under that bridge in her father’s little boat. Soon, their house may be right up the cliff from this toxic pollution that is threatening the bay. We’ll probably never have another summer there.

#14 - Boston Globe Big Picture, click to view the whole series

Oil slicks move toward the beach in Gulf Shores, Alabama, Saturday, June 5, 2010. Oil from the Deepwater Horizon disaster has started washing ashore on the Alabama and Florida coast beaches. (AP Photo/Dave Martin)

The first time I met my wife in the flesh, we visited her best friend (and future bridesmaid), and we all went to Gulf Shores. The sea there was beautiful, pale blue green with pristine white beaches. Thanks to British Polluters, the earth is now bleeding poison, turning the beach red and the waters black. The fumes will be endangering the health of the few brave enough to walk there and experience the tragedy for themselves.

#24 A worker uses a suction hose to remove oil that has washed ashore from the Deepwater Horizon spill, Sunday, June 6, 2010 in Grand Isle, Louisiana. (AP Photo/Eric Gay)

#24 A worker uses a suction hose to remove oil that has washed ashore from the Deepwater Horizon spill, Sunday, June 6, 2010 in Grand Isle, Louisiana. (AP Photo/Eric Gay)

The first time we met, we stayed in New Orleans for a week. We didn’t go to Grand Isle, but we passed by the freeway exits on our way to her best friend’s house. This picture isn’t here for personal reasons, but to illustrate the scale and scope of British Polluters‘ response to the crisis. The following images will continue this tale of the alacrity of their response.

Gas is flared off on the Discovery Enterprise drilling ship which is collecting oil at the site of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico off the Louisiana coast Wednesday, June 9, 2010.

Gas is flared off on the Discovery Enterprise drilling ship which is collecting oil at the site of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico off the Louisiana coast Wednesday, June 9, 2010.

Yeah, gas comes out of the well too. But we don’t have a good way to capture it. I just hope it’s natural gas (which burns clean) and not dirty ass gasoline they’re flaring off there. All oil rigs do that, 24/7 unless they have to disconnect due to storms. Even on a working well, they’re still working hard at polluting. Even if it is natural gas, everything on the ships runs off diesel generators.

A controlled burn of oil from the Deepwater Horizon/BP oil spill sends towers of fire hundreds of feet into the air over the Gulf of Mexico June 9. (U.S. Coast Guard Photo by Petty Officer First Class John Masson)

A controlled burn of oil from the Deepwater Horizon/BP oil spill sends towers of fire hundreds of feet into the air over the Gulf of Mexico June 9. (U.S. Coast Guard Photo by Petty Officer First Class John Masson)

So far the quickest way to get rid of the pollution of surface slick is to just burn the shit. Pollute the sky, why not? There’s so much sky a little more pollution wont matter, and it’s a whole lot less mediapathic when it’s disappeared as invisible toxic chemicals for the whole world to breathe. As long as it can’t be photographed in huge chunks British Polluters doesn’t give a fuck where it is or how toxic it may be, they just need this out of the headlines and the well working so they can start making money on it instead of losing cash to the cleanup.

#41 Streaks of oil sheens are seen north of the site of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico off the Alabama coast as viewed from a Coast Guard HC-144A plane Thursday, June 10, 2010. (AP Photo/Mobile Press-Register, John David Mercer)

#41 Streaks of oil sheens are seen north of the site of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico off the Alabama coast as viewed from a Coast Guard HC-144A plane Thursday, June 10, 2010. (AP Photo/Mobile Press-Register, John David Mercer)

See those ships, way out there? How freaking hopeless does it look, even this small patch of slicks compared to the clean-up effort.

#30 NASA's Aqua satellite flew over the Gulf of Mexico on Thursday, June 10th, 2010 and the satellite's Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instrument captured this image of the thickest part of the oil slick. In the image, the oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico is positioned in sunglint. In the sunglint region - where the mirror-like reflection of the Sun gets blurred into a wide, bright silvery-gray strip - differences in the texture of the water surface may be enhanced. In the thickest part of the slick, oil smooths the water, making it a better "mirror." Areas where thick oil cover the water are nearly white in this image. Additional oil may also be present. (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)

Can you spot the clean up effort, here? That’s right, any image that can show the whole of the slick is incapable of showing the clean-up effort too, the size differences are just too massive. And this doesn’t include the undersea plumes that the 800,000 gallons of toxic, petroleum-based dispersant British Polluters pumped into the well has created.

British Polluters has had two major oil spills in the last couple of years, as well as 760 safety violations – before the Deepwater Horizon exploded (hopefully a precursor to BP’s eventual fate). For more on this, we turn to Jon Steward for some righteous yelling. (Feed readers may have to click through for the embedded video)

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Cenac – The Spilling Fields – Oil Leak Containment Ideas
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Tea Party

This is an absolute horror, and it’s only going to get worse before it gets better as this oil finds places to settle.

No, you hold on a minute, D. Pogue

Monday, June 7th, 2010

>I don’t know if you’ve seen the frantic blog headlines, but they boil down to this: Those big, greedy, monolithic cellphone companies have found yet another way to gouge us for more money.

Well, hold on a minute.

AT&T is a business. They don’t do stuff unless they think it’s gonna make them more money. End of story. They will give you a host of reasons but what it boils down to is the bottom line. They are a publicly traded company and they have a fiduciary duty to their shareholders to make money. Or the shareholders can sue them. That’s how capitalism works.

So, uh, yeah, they are trying to gouge you for more money. Not us, because I left them long ago due to their horrible (well, not so much horrible as non-existent) support for the technology their phones used (Oh, can’t plug that into your computer? Yeah, we don’t support that, sorry you spent the extra money for a phone that hooks up to your computer.)

T-Mobile caught me on the rebound and has served me well ever since. Long live Android and have fun paying the AT&T tax to use your shiny new iPhone 4. It almost multitasks but good thing it doesn’t really so you wont have to worry about it sneaking data down in the background.

UPDATE:

Well, I’m not too worried about the video-calling thing. You could videochat for 15 minutes every single day and still use up less than half of your DataPro allotment.

Oh, except you can’t because video chat doesn’t work on 3G, only WiFi. Currently anyway.

Another thing that grinds my gears on the whole thing is AT&T’s pricing scheme. $15 for 200 MB, $25 for 2GB. If you pass your initial 200, you pay $15 for another 200. That’s right, for 400MB you’ll pay what users are currently paying for unlimited. Sure, you can save yourself potentially $360 a year, but only if you stop using everything but the phone feature after you hit that 200, otherwise you’re just paying the same for crap. Currently, they claim, 98% of their users use less than 2 gigs a month. But if so few users are using ‘excessive’ bandwidth, why is their network so shitty and how will this pricing plan have those 2% of users paying for all that ‘excessive’ bandwidth that’s supposedly killing their network.

Why is their network so shitty that 2% of their users can kill it, and making those users pay an extra 5$ a month going to pay to upgrade their network?

It’s not. This is a play to extract extra money from those who are bad at math and just trying to save a couple bux up front, never realizing they’ll be paying 5$ more than the people getting 5x their bandwidth when they go over that measly 200 megs.

Can make meat taste like damp dog hair

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

Beyond its own taste, salt also masks bitter flavors and counters a side effect of processed food production called “warmed-over flavor,” which, the [industry food] scientists said, can make meat taste like “cardboard” or “damp dog hair.”

That’s probably a sign, when near-dangerous amounts of salt are needed to make beef not taste like damp dog hair, that you shouldn’t be eating the food to begin with. I’m just sayin…

BP.COM British Polluters

Monday, May 31st, 2010

I just realized that no one is linking British Polluters on the web. This needs to start. British Polluters needs to return bp.com as the top result on Google. Get to work.

Hey look, the “dispersant” that BP (British Polluters) is using is made out of oil…

Monday, May 24th, 2010

The proprietary composition is not public, but the manufacturer’s own safety data sheet on Corexit EC9527A says the main components are 2-butoxyethanol and a proprietary organic sulfonic acid salt with a small concentration of propylene glycol.[6][7] Corexit EC9500A is mainly comprised of hydrotreated light petroleum distillates, propylene glycol and a proprietary organic sulfonic acid salt.[8]

How much you want to bet they’re using it because they supply the provider with the petroleum used to make what they’re buying back from them in million-gallon quantities?

I wont bet anything on that. I know better than to test those odds.