Archive for the ‘trees’ Category

What a difference a day makes

Sunday, July 11th, 2010

my friend just showed me these chaps. brilliant! I can imagine something like this would never be aired in the US (well, excepting pay channels like HBO), let alone on broadcast TV.

Angkor Wat did you say?

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

Angkor Wat, Angkor, Cambodia.

Angkor Wat, Angkor, Cambodia.

Want to grow a house out of a tree, full-size bonsai/penjing, with roots like that. Living/art/chitecture.

Freeman Dyson = awesome

Wednesday, March 25th, 2009

Winchester is a medieval town in which, Dyson writes, he felt that everyone was looking backward, mourning all the young men lost to one world war while silently anticipating his own generation’s impending demise. He renounced the nostalgia, the servants, the hard-line social castes. But what he liked about growing up in England was the landscape. The country’s successful alteration of wilderness and swamp had created a completely new green ecology, allowing plants, animals and humans to thrive in “a community of species.” Dyson has always been strongly opposed to the idea that there is any such thing as an optimal ecosystem — “life is always changing” — and he abhors the notion that men and women are something apart from nature, that “we must apologize for being human.” Humans, he says, have a duty to restructure nature for their survival.

Now that’s a philosophy I can dig. Mainly because it’s one I hold myself.

What may trouble Dyson most about climate change are the experts. Experts are, he thinks, too often crippled by the conventional wisdom they create, leading to the belief that “they know it all.” The men he most admires tend to be what he calls “amateurs,” inventive spirits of uncredentialed brilliance like Bernhard Schmidt, an eccentric one-armed alcoholic telescope-lens designer; Milton Humason, a janitor at Mount Wilson Observatory in California whose native scientific aptitude was such that he was promoted to staff astronomer; and especially Darwin, who, Dyson says, “was really an amateur and beat the professionals at their own game.” It’s a point of pride with Dyson that in 1951 he became a member of the physics faculty at Cornell and then, two years later, moved on to the Institute for Advanced Study, where he became an influential man, a pragmatist providing solutions to the military and Congress, and also the 2000 winner of the $1 million Templeton Prize for broadening the understanding of science and religion, an award previously given to Mother Teresa and Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn — all without ever earning a Ph.D. Dyson may, in fact, be the ultimate outsider-insider, “the world’s most civil heretic,” as the classical composer Paul Moravec, the artistic consultant at the institute, says of him.

Huge article, magazine style, but pretty entertaining. I’ll finish the rest of it tomorrow, just wanted to make sure this showed up on the radar.

From Discovery channel to Disco

Tuesday, February 24th, 2009

I think it’s interesting to note that the decade and drugs have changed but the music has stayed the same. This is, however, is in stark contrast to the giggler I watched prior, but hey, I guess that’s why you don’t start off with a high dose of an unknown, though legal, drug. At least it wasn’t acid, which would last for twelve hours, not 3 minutes, though I’ve heard people say it can be like a whole acid trip in the few minutes.

And yet, it’s another plant that humans have been enjoying a relationship with for hundreds or thousands of years. Though admittedly in a religious context rather than this one, but if this is the effect it produces, well, is it any wonder ancient religions were so strange?

And it makes you slobber. What could be more fun than that?

Bonsai, giant trees, habitation

Wednesday, February 4th, 2009

So what’s one of the main fears of people owning houses with trees growing nearby? The tree falling down and crush-crush-crushing the house. So what do they do? They trim the tree mercilessly, without regard to the health of the tree. What does that do? It allows disease into the tree, which rots it, and eventually makes it fall down on your house.

I’m thinking a series of carbo/aramid/expoxy wrapped bamboo trusses could be used to help prop trees up and away from the house (standard tall-X shape leaned away from the house and planted a few feet into some permeable concrete plugs in the ground. Japanese gardens make much use of this on a small scale, but I want to keep massive oaks or camphors sheltering my house.

Which brings me to point two, habitation. If we can have super-strong trusses holding our trees up, what’s to stop us from just building up on/in that? Especially camphors, which are highly disease resistant. The idea is we’ll treat large trees sorta like bonsai (without all the root shenanigans) – training them to grow where we want, selectively keeping strategic branches but taking utmost care when we cut to properly protect our tree from disease – grow the tree in such a way to gently encompass the house, truss the branches in aforementioned ways to help support them and the house, of course build the house out of high-strength, lightweight composites. At times the trusses may need to be jacked up and more concrete backfilled under them, if the tree grows taller, though the pace is very, very slow. Another thing: how many houses outlast trees? How many human lives can outlast a tree, if well taken care of? None! Well, no houses made out of tree material – I’m sure some ancient stone domiciles outlast the 2000 and 3000+ year old trees we’ve found – but are no longer considered habitable by most means. The trees however are still making leaves and growing.

Oh yeah, don’t live in a hurricane or tornado prone area. Flooding and snowing should be okay (Go ahead, try to flood my treehouse Ms. Nature) as long as the roof is designed to easily shed snow (i.e. tall and tapering at the top).